Mass Negative Steam Reviews Flood Slay the Spire 2 Over Anticipated Card Nerf, While China’s Steam Restrictions May Have Amplified the Backlash
Within a single day, the Steam page for Slay the Spire 2 was hit with more than 9,000 negative reviews. The outcry was sparked not by a live change to the game, but by an announced nerf to a single card that has yet to appear in any build. While the community’s frustration is understandable, many observers point to China’s recent Steam restrictions as a hidden catalyst that helped turn a vocal minority into a tidal wave of low‑star ratings.
What prompted the sudden deluge of negative reviews?
In early March 2024, MegaCrit, the studio behind the roguelike deck‑building hit, posted an update on its official Discord and on the game’s Steam news hub. The message warned that a “high‑impact” card—widely regarded as one of the strongest options in the early‑game meta—would receive a balance tweak in the next patch. The developers did not disclose the exact numbers, but they hinted that the card’s damage output and draw rate would be reduced.
For a game that thrives on strategic deck construction, any alteration to a cornerstone card can feel like a seismic shift. Players who had built their runs around the card’s power felt blindsided, fearing that their carefully honed strategies would become obsolete. The announcement quickly spread across Reddit’s r/SlayTheSpire, Twitter, and Discord servers, where the tone turned from curiosity to anger within hours.
What made the situation more volatile was the timing. The nerf had not yet been implemented in any public build, meaning that the game’s current version still featured the original, unaltered card. Yet, the mere promise of a change was enough to trigger a wave of “review bombing”—the practice of posting a large number of low‑star reviews in a short period to protest a perceived grievance.
- Announcement without a concrete timeline: MegaCrit said the nerf would land in a “future patch,” leaving players uncertain about when they would need to adapt.
- Perceived lack of communication: Long‑time fans argued that the studio had not consulted the community before deciding on the balance change.
- Meta‑dependence: The card in question is a staple in many high‑level runs, so its alteration threatens the viability of existing deck archetypes.
- Emotional investment: After months of grinding for perfect runs, players felt their effort was being devalued.
Within 24 hours, the Steam review section showed a sharp dip, with the overall rating sliding from a respectable 92

Leave a Comment